The Talmud

• Yayın Hakkında
• Özellikler
• Yorumlar
• İlave Dosyalar
• Satış/Tedarik

Kapat

---

  Kitap Tanıtım Yazısı : (Arka Kapak)
  It appears from the undisguised acknowledgments of the New Testament, that the doctors and
  rabbies of the Jews, the Pharisees, and scribes, were the implacable enemies of Jesus of Nazareth,
  and that they were the main instruments in effecting his death. The modern Jews consider this fact
  as a sufficient apology for their rejection of his claims to the Messiahship. They take it for
  granted that the great and learned men of that day were also good men, and that they had valid
  reasons for their conduct. They think if Jesus of Nazareth had been the true Messiah, that the
  Sanhedrin, the great Jewish council of the time, would have acknowledged him, and conclude
  that, as they rejected him, he cannot be the true Messiah. The New Testament, on the contrary,
  accounts for their unbelief by plainly telling us, that they were bad men; and that they were
  enemies to the Lord Jesus, because he told them the truth, and exposed their hypocrisy. Now,
  which of these two representations accords with the truth? Were the scribes and Pharisees, those
  great advocates of the oral law, פה שבעל תורה, good men or bad men? The readers of our first
  number will be in some degree qualified to answer this question. Could those be good men who
  profanely talked of the lawfulness of killing an unlearned man, and who contemptuously
  compared the wives and daughters of the unlearned to vermin and beasts? If they could talk
  with levity of rending like a fish an unlearned man, one of their own brethren who had never
  done them any harm, what were they likely to do with one who exposed their wickedness, and
  boldly told them that they by their traditions made void the law of God? The very fact, that Jesus
  of Nazareth was put to death by such men, is presumptive evidence, that he was a good man, and
  
  v